Mimanifesto – Jaye’s weblog

What on earth are City Properties up too?

Posted by: mimanifesto on: May 28, 2012

You might well ask. That is, if you’re a casual observer or interested party, or plain old nosey Parker wandering past Trongate and down the Saltmarket in Glasgow’s Merchant City. You can’t fail to notice the forest of ‘To Let’ signs over vacant shop and business premises, courtesy of estate agents Ryden. It’s the same in some other parts of Glasgow as well.

Why does Labour-controlled Glasgow City Council appear to have no interest in stimulating the small business demand by doing something about its empty property portfolio, all sitting there empty and gathering dust, as well as costing a pretty penny in management fees, no doubt.

We’ve just vacated our premises, driven out of the city into an industrial unit by the sheer craziness of rent demands from City Properties, the arms-length body which manages the Glasgow municipal portfolio. And let’s not mention the water and sewerage charges levied by Scottish Water, despite the rate relief applied to small business. Our former gallery on the Saltmarket is still vacant, more than a year after we left it, and there are eight others empty in the immediate area.

What to do then? Why are City Properties content to force businesses out of the city centre with their crazy rent demands? And what on earth are Ryden doing to fill these empty shops up? Not much at all is the truth of it. And why should they…after all, they get paid regardless.

I’m about to put in some FOI requests to Glasgow City Council about this, asking how much they pay Ryden to do diddly squat about vacant properties and just how much empty square footage exists, as a percentage of their total property portfolio, as well as what their strategy is for filling up the empty shops. I don’t expect much in the way of useful answers though. The usual about how the city council tries to encourage small business with a range of initiatives blah blah etc etc… Well, I’ve not seen any of this…only the rent demands. I’ve not seen Ryden doing much in the way of marketing either.

Here’s an idea for the Trongate, High Street, and the Saltmarket. Offer six month rent free periods for new business taking on these premises. You could create an Artist’s corridor… This would allow businesses time to get established and grow, creating jobs and contributing to the city’s economy. The area would be more occupied so crime and disorderly behaviour would reduce. The area would look nicer too. At the moment, it’s an eyesore to be honest and certainly not attractive to new business. The district court is closing down this summer, and there will be less and less of a footfall in the area because of this. Something needs to be done to encourage visitors to the area, few and far between since City Properties paid through the nose for the Paddy’s Market site, promising to redevelop it, then closing down the market (a Glasgow institution and tourist attraction, by the way) and claiming it needs oodles more money to do the job.

This might appear to be a bit of a simplistic idea, but then again, the best ones always are, aren’t they? What’s stopping Glasgow City Council from doing something like this? They need to do something otherwise this part of town will become a ghost town ghetto.

Or maybe it’s a bit mo complicated. Are there any links between Ryden and City property folks or councillors maybe. Perhaps this might be a suitable subject for an FOI…

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Glow- where is it going?

Posted by: mimanifesto on: May 9, 2012

There’s a lot of stuff swirling around the web about Glow at the moment. Twitter is awash with rumours, Google pull out of a dubious procurement exercise in which the goalposts appeared (from the Invitation To Tender document, anyway) to change almost daily! Microsoft appear to be offering a product which is based on the same SharePoint software underpinning the current iteration of Glow and which wasn’t even launched internationally when the procurement closed. The Microsoft product won’t run on mobile devices which, it’s being pointed out, puts it on a collision course with the Government’s Bring Your Own Device strategy.

The results of the user engagement testing by teachers and pupils of both Google apps for Education, and Microsoft 365 are shrouded in mystery. A recommendation was made to the Glow programme board, and then promptly ignored by a bunch of people who have never actually used Glow in action, let alone taught a class full of fourteen year olds with it! Trudi Sharpe and Andy McLintock of the Scottish Government civil service appear to stage a coup d’état and Andrew Brown disappears…

Freedom of Information requests arrive at the Scottish Government like bullets seeking out their targets in ISIS or Education Scotland. Civil servants move into back-covering mode…

I was going to blog about all of this this week. However, there is an awful lot of work going on in the background, and behind the scenes. Some very careful evidence gathering needs to be completed in order to clarify the very muddy waters which are in danger of snuffing out GLOW in a morass of very bad decisions. Quite a few folks are putting in overtime trying to decipher this whole sorry situation, and have been for the best part of this year. It’s important to let this work continue without the distraction of supposition and guesswork. It’s too important an issue to education in Scotland to become clouded in a ping pong game of ‘he said-she said’

So I’m going to wait before blogging anything. I hope others decide to follow suit while this work continues…..

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Scottish Government bowled a right proper Googly

Posted by: mimanifesto on: May 2, 2012

So, google have withdrawn from the Glow procurement process. Their letter, sent to all LA’s in Scotland is self explanatory. Many of you know that they were involved in user testing with representatives from every LA in the country earlier this year, along with Microsoft 365.

20120502-161203.jpg

The Worlds favourite airline? Not!

Posted by: mimanifesto on: May 2, 2012

My elderly mother in law flew back to South Africa on Sunday. We thought she’d be fine with BA. We’d booked assistance for her transfer to the Cape Town flight at Heathrow. All fine. But at the check-in it all started to go wrong. Firstly, the BA flight to London was delayed due to the wind! This meant she’d miss her connection to Cape Town. No problem said BA’s agent….she could fly to Johannesburg and connect onwards to Cape Town. Ok, she’d arrive seven hours later and have an extra change, but they’d look after her and help her at Jo’Burg….all well and good. Err, no. Firstly, nothing offered to compensate for the delay, despite the flight originating in the EU. The Servisair (agents for BA) batted this one away quicker than Kevin Peterson on a flat track. “you’ll have to write to BA” then they charged her £40 for taking an extra bag, depute the fact that her hold luggage came in at only 22kg combined! She uses two suitcases because at 79 years old, it’s difficult for her to carry a big case about at each end of the flight. This has never been a problem for KLM, Virgin, or SAA, but it’s apparently an opportunity for the money-grabbing bastards at BA….the Servisair woman again batted this one away, Ian Botham style. “You’ll have to write to BA” she said, as if someone was pulling a string in her back to activate a pre-programmed response.

But it gets worse….

On boarding the Jo’Burg flight, she asked the cabin crew to help her lift her bag into the overhead lockers. And the jobsworths refused!! Unbelievable, as was the response. “it’s not our job” she said. So this is the service you can expect from a company which likes to proclaim itself as the ‘Worlds Favourite Airline’…

When I took BA to task on twitter, they batted it away, quicker than a metaphor involving a Servisair agent and a famous cricketer by explaining that the refusal was to ‘prevent the possibility of injury’. What utter shite! If I’d have been on that flight, I’d have put the bag at my feet, sat down, and let them deal with the bag.

My point is that every other airline I’ve ever flown with would have helped an elderly frail old lady with her bags. My wife (her daughter) flew to Cape Town earlier that day with KLM and as she’s disabled, they gave her every assistance she asked for, including help with her bags.

So British Airways… You’ve lost our families business. Well be making a point of not flying back and forward to South Africa with you. Because Virgin, KLM, Lufthansa, Emirates, and good old SAA all know that the most important thing for their business success are their customers. Something BA need to wake up and realise….

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Faith in Marriage

Posted by: mimanifesto on: May 1, 2012

I was at the Scottish Parliament yesterday for the launch of the Faith in Marriage coalition. For anyone who’s missed the news, this is a group of faith leaders and representatives arguing for religious freedom of choice. It’s a message which is in stark contrast to that of the rather strangely named ‘Scotland for Marriage’ group who are seeking to restrict freedom of religious choice and impose their own narrow minority view on the majority. I was there in an official capacity as co convenor of Changing Attitude Scotland, a group working to effect change and advance the cause of equality in the Scottish Episcopal Church. Now, religious freedom has to cut both ways, as the vast majority of politicians across Scotland have already pointed out to these faith leaders protesting about the proposed changes to marriage law. You can’t claim the right to not conduct same-sex marriage on the grounds of freedom of religion whilst seeking to prevent those faiths who do wish to marry same-sex couples from doing so. Because religious freedom has to cut both ways in any democratic and free society. It’s a point which appears to have escaped the odious John Deighan from the Roman Catholic Education Service here in Scotland. On News night Scotland yesterday evening, he tried, and failed, to defend the indefensible, becoming more and more aggressive until he finally spat out the dummy, accusing the Equality Network of spending ‘Millions’ on advancing the cause of marriage equality. Tom French, from the EN managed to remain calm in the face of this provocation, simply reiterating the point that freedom of religion has to work for both sides of this particular debate.

But poor John can’t help it…he’s simply modelling the behaviour of his own particular churches ‘bigot bishops and cruel cardinals’

Thankfully, he’s in a minority. The Humanists conduct more weddings in Scotland than the RC church, and when you add the Unitarians, United Reformed Church, Quakers, Liberal Jews, Pagans, Buddhists, and Open Episcopalians, as well as significant parts of both the Church of Scotland and Scottish Episcopal church, I think anyone can see a very significant faith group indeed.
And that’s Faith in Marriage…a coalition standing for real and meaningful religious freedom.

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Easter message

Posted by: mimanifesto on: April 8, 2012

I couldn’t put it much better than the Provost of Glasgow’s St Mary’s Cathedral, the Very Rev. Kelvin Holdsworth did in his Easter day sermon

As usual, whilst Cardinal O’Brien preached his usual gay-bashing ‘you’re dammed unless you’re one of us’ diatribes from Edinburgh, a line slavishly followed by his acolytes here in Glasgow and Paisley, Kelvin’s message was one of love, tolerance, inclusion, and above all hope.

He of course, took Cardinal O’Brien and his Bishops to task, gently suggesting a better direction for them to travel whilst at the same time providing a marvellous headline for tomorrows newspapers and news bulletins. But he also called on government and big business to change their ways.

A wonderful uplifting address, beautifully crafted, and for me and the hundreds of others who were present, capturing the essence of the Easter message perfectly. But don’t take my word. Read his text yourself, or better still watch and listen to his words. It should be on his blog

And a very happy and peaceful Easter to you all :-)

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Test

Posted by: mimanifesto on: April 8, 2012

This is a test post

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

iPad Applications In Bloom’s Taxonomy | Upside Learning Blog

Posted by: mimanifesto on: April 1, 2012

Via Scoop.itEducation and Technology

Check this interesting graphic that actually places example iPad applications into Bloom’s levels of performance in the cognitive domain.
Via www.upsidelearning.com

A cardinal sin…

Posted by: mimanifesto on: March 18, 2012

The UK’s most senior Roman Catholic has been sounding off against marriage equality again. Cardinal Keith O’Brien, in concert with English bishops Nicholls and Smith has been on the stump peddling his peculiar brand of prejudice again. Apparently, he’s been likening marriage equality to slavery and his English buddies have backed this up by forcing their congregations up and down the land to listen to their exhortations to fight against what they see as Armageddon, the end of civilisation as we know it, etc etc etc…

I’m angry now…..very angry.

The Cardinal claims biblical authority to ‘preach and teach’ however we all know he’s on shaky ground here with the little known (!) fact that the bible actually says nothing against marriage equality at all. Nowt, nada, zilch, whatever negative you wish to use. Why is the Cardinal not waging his holy war against those of us who eat Mussels, I wonder? Or perhaps those of you who wear clothes made from mixed fibres will be next in line for the Cardinal’s ire. The fact is that the lobster-eating Primark-wearing meat and milk mixing brigades out there have, we are told in the bible, much more to fear from God than those of us who are married to same-sex partners.

In fact the Cardinal is pissing in the wind somewhat, with more and more countries legislating for marriage equality, including staunchly Roman Catholic ones such as Spain and Portugal. It’s coming here too Keith, and there’s not much you can do about it except it seems, misquote and distort holy scripture for your own ends.

And the real truth of the matter is the perverse reality of a church in which child abuse is an embedded reality, an organisation which conspires to cover up its priestly shenanigans. A faith which denies protection against HIV/AIDS by its stance on barrier contraception. Where you have the Blessed JP II responsible (according to many) for the deaths of millions of Africans by scaring them away from condoms, the current pope who has been deeply involved with the cover-up of abuses, a continuing ban on women in the priesthood, and a previous Scottish cardinal who declared LGBT folks unfit to be teachers, it’s a wonder anybody takes them seriously. It’s certainly true of congregations here in the UK where over half disagree with their leaders on the issue of marriage equality.

Instead of worrying about Condoms, Gays, and Women, they should be concerned about their own dirty, shameful, past of covering up for all of their pedophile priests and abusive nuns. And of course about child poverty and domestic abuse which I might venture are of much more threat to the future of society than making marriage open to everyone.

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Brian Boyd and the great big ACfE debacle..

Posted by: mimanifesto on: February 8, 2012

I read Brian Boyd’s recent eloquent defence of a Curriculum for Excellence(ACfE) with great interest (letters, The Herald February 7th). I have to say that I believe ACfE does not go far enough.
In my view, The problem of teaching to the test and death by past-paper which currently exists in our schools will not die the death it deserves until all examinations are abolished at the S4 stage. The new system keeps the exam, in the form of the new national 5, albeit for a smaller percentage of pupils and therefore, the old teaching methods will continue as long as the exam, in whatever format, exists.

What is wrong with a school leaving certificate for all sixteen year olds anyway? Its good enough for Finland, against whom we constantly compare and benchmark our education system. Teachers are best placed to make judgements as to the abilities and efforts, as well as the characters of their students. As in Finland, a school leaving certificate could be a passport to either higher level study, vocational and work-related education and training, or even work itself.

The problem with our education system is not and never was ACfE and it’s introduction, which was underfunded and poorly managed by both the government through Learning and teaching Scotland (who couldn’t have project managed their way out of the front door and should never have been given the job in the first place) and Local Education authorities who siphoned off most of the money rather than giving it to schools where it should have gone in the first place.

Imagine this: if the whole pot of dosh that has been spent so far on ACfE and GLOW had been divi’d up between all the schools, what might they have done with this? Formed their own communities of practice to pool and share resources, networked on line across the country, and taken time out to think and reflect?

No, the real problem with ACfE lies with the almost fanatical insistence on testing and examination in our schools which results in pupils being crammed with facts to remember leading to shallow knowledge retention lasting, in the most part, only as far as the exit door of the exam hall.

In this day and age, most of what we need to know can be found on the Internet with one or two clicks at most. What we really need to be teaching children are the skills to find, evaluate, present, and use the knowledge they need. This will never be done with tests and exams in their current format, whatever name we choose to label them with.

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Gay marriage won’t make the world stop turning – Telegraph.co.uk

Posted by: mimanifesto on: February 2, 2012

Via Scoop.itMarriage Equality in Scotland

Telegraph.co.ukGay marriage won’t make the world stop turningTelegraph.co.ukUntil Civil Partnerships came along in 2004, gays would typically use contract law to approach a similar legal outcome as full legal marriage.
Via www.telegraph.co.uk

Via Scoop.itMarriage Equality in Scotland

stv.tvSame sex marriage campaign wins political leaders’ supportstv.tvLeaders of the main political parties pledged support to moves to legalise same sex marriage.
Via news.stv.tv

Via Scoop.itAutism News and research

Daily MailNow in one in 100 adults has autism with the condition much more likely to …Daily MailAnd as with children, the study has found that autism is far commoner in males than females.
Via www.dailymail.co.uk

Thought for the night…

Posted by: mimanifesto on: February 1, 2012

Nobody trips over mountains. It is the small pebble that causes you to stumble. Pass all the pebbles in your path and you will find you have crossed the mountain.

And this is just what the Equal Marriage campaign in Scotland is doing, winning hearts and minds in the process. Tonight’s parliamentary reception at Holyrood was the biggest in the Scottish Parliament’s history! All the opposition party leaders support the change to the law, as do most of the Government ministers.

Historic change is coming…..

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

I do…

Posted by: mimanifesto on: January 29, 2012

The wife and I were guests on BBC1′s Big Questions discussion programme this morning. I use the term *wife* because that is what she is to me, and I to her, despite anything the Free Church, Catholic Bishops, or anyone else may think. I find it rather depressing that despite us legally marrying in another Commonwealth country, they won’t accept the validity, moral, spiritual or otherwise, of our marriage and of the certificate I carry in my purse. What they’re trying to tell me, I guess, is that when the plane takes off from Jo’Burg…we’re married, but by the time we land in Glasgow…we’re civil partners, even though it’s a marriage certificate we have. We are walking talking legal and spiritual anomalies I think, at least according to some religious groups and ministers here in Scotland.

Despite all the biblical arguments, dire warnings of the breakdown of society, and other threats, the real issue is one of religious freedom, both to not carry out same-sex marriage, or, to carry them out. We were told in the programme by CARE for Scotland, a Christian group, that this freedom of religion must be proportionate, but this also cuts both ways. The Humanist society of Scotland performs more marriages than the RC church so should they have a greater say?

Religious freedom must indeed, cut both ways. It works well in other countries so why not here in Scotland. However the most significant thing which struck me about all the comment on this morning’s broadcast was this; that it appears most folks in Scotland are amazed we are having this debate at all. That in this 21st century a simple matter of equality in society actually needs to be debated, when it should in fact be a given.

For this is not about the rights under civil partnership being the same as those under marriage. It’s about the lack of equality in choice. The spurious arguments about polyandry and ancestral marriage don’t wash either, for both states are made by active decision, whereas being Gay or Lesbian is not choice but a fact of birth.

Equality should exist in all parts of society, including marriage. Anything less is discrimination pure and simple. In this day and age, this has to be the only moral state allowable.

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

The real truth about the benefits cap….

Posted by: mimanifesto on: January 25, 2012

The Government’s arguments over the proposed benefit cap appear, to me anyway, to be fundamentally flawed. The figure of £26k which is supposed to represent the average annual salary might well be the place to start, but the government is looking at this in the wrong way for several reasons.

Firstly, the 67000 households who claim more than the £26k do this because of their circumstances. A family of five are always going to claim more than a single person who shares a flat with friends or lives with his/her parents. Some folks have large families, and whilst there certainly are arguments against the state footing the bill for this, there are explanations for this. Religious freedom, something we prize and hold dear in this country, sometimes means that certain folks will have larger than average families. The orthodox Jewish communities are just one example of this. Widowed folks might also be in the same situation. Life has a sometimes cruel way of forcing people into unfortunate and unforeseen circumstances. Unemployment very often reduces the family income to a point where they rely on benefits to make sure that their children don’t suffer unnecessarily.

Secondly, most of this £26K does not find it’s way into the pockets of the claimants, but goes instead directly to their landlords. Our economic mismanagement; the boom and bust years; political control of interest rates…all of these have lead to artificially high and ultimately unsustainable property prices. This translates directly into artificially high rents, which claimants have no control over. Telling them to move to cheaper areas with lower property rents is a short term and artificial saving, as rents will rise in these areas as demand increases. But what about the children who will be forced to uproot, move school, and leave behind social and support networks? How will the demand for extra school places in the ‘lower rent’ areas be met? And what about the schools from which these children have been forced to exit? Surplus capacity also costs money to maintain. School closure battles will commence in some areas whilst over demand will lead to expensive short term accommodation solutions for other areas…and extra medical services will need to be established to cope with an influx of new patients…the list goes on. Moving these families (half of the 67,000 live in London) is a false economy in the long run, and do we really expect them to move large distances away, deconstructing and reconstructing their entire lives? Just to save what will in fact be a pittance? I am coming to the view that this proposal is based on populist scaremongering (a la Daily Mail) and social stigmatisation of a particular group of people. This kind of thing happened in Germany and Italy during the first half of the last century and we are in danger of heading down a similar road. Many of these claimants are disabled and have special needs. The government is in danger of being seen as picking upon this vulnerable group who very often lack the means to fight back. We need rent controls to deal with this, and ultimately, more social housing will force greedy landlords to lower their rents to more realistic and affordable levels, or sell up and get out. The landlords must be quite happy that the claimants are taking the flak for the high cost of housing rather than themselves!

Thirdly, if people are forced out of their homes because of this proposal, then their local councils have to pick up the pieces by rehousing them. Short term accommodation is probably going to be more expensive than the properties they have had to vacate…so where’s the saving there, Mr Duncan-Smith!

Fourthly, we don’t include child benefit when we calculate the ‘average’ wage. So why should benefit claimants loose this due to their high housing benefit claim? Are we really saying that a family with , say an income of £100K can claim child benefit, but a family on benefits ( maybe due to disability) can not?

Kate and Wills, if they’re blessed with a child could claim but a crippled single mother of three cannot?. This is just crazy.

Fifthly (!) The aim of these proposals is to ‘encourage’ the claimants back into employment. Well, it might do this to some, but the flaw in this argument is that a large proportion of the 67,000 will never be able to work due to disability of because they are carers ( who incidentally, save this country a small fortune in care costs ). Why should they be forced to move, their already stretched incomes cut further to satisfy this Tory populist blood-lust? Social services and the NHS will have to pick up the tab here with revised care assessments, adjustments to new homes, and increased levels of ill health.

Are the LibDems really supportive of these changes? I hope they force the government to have a rethink. Where are the real cost savings, if any, from these proposals taking into account the many indirect costs. Or is it that the Government wants to gain more control over local government spending by the back door of increasing need, which these proposals, if they become law, almost certainly will. Labour needs to step up to the plate and be an opposition. Here in Scotland, Nicola Sturgeon is already talking of not giving Scottish Government approval to the legislation. Good on her for standing up for the moral imperative to do what’s right in society, where the principle of taking care of those less fortunate should be a hallmark, not a cost limited cosh…

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

How could you spend it?

Posted by: mimanifesto on: January 21, 2012

How could you spend £11 million ?

Well, how about some of the following…

Running costs for maybe fifteen secondary schools for a year
Salaries of 300 or so extra nurses
1100 extra hip replacement operations
11 day centres for adults with learning disabilities or elderly people
Free school meals for all children
A new hospital maybe?
Extra respite care for parents of disabled children…20 thousand holiday places for these parents who never get a decent break.
Public sector workers get inflation matching payrises
Pensions for care workers, nurses, teachers, fire and rescue workers, ambulance staff maintained at current levels.

What else could you add to the list?

And what will Barclay’s Bank chief executive Bob Diamond do with his £11 million bonus when he picks it up in a few weeks time ?

Economic crisis? All in it together? I don’t think so.
Cutting disability benefits to pay for an economic crisis caused largely by people like Mr Diamond, whilst they still get their huge bonuses is obscene and sick. What value is £11 million to him anyway? An extra £100 a month to severely disabled folk and their families has much more meaning.

Anyone for a 90% supertax on bank bonuses over, say £10K? That would get my vote….

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Are they really lying Tory bastards?

Posted by: mimanifesto on: January 17, 2012

A quote from a recent Guardian online report on the proposed abolition of Disability Living Allowance..

“Francis Maude, the Cabinet Office minister, is the Fords’ MP, and Emma rolls her eyes when she tells of his doorstep visit at the last election: “I said I was really worried his party would cut benefits for disabled people. He said to me, face to face, ‘You know about David Cameron’s son, that’s why you know there’s no way we’re going to harm disabled children like yours’. Right there, on our doorstep.”

And the title of this blog post? Judge for yourselves…

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Where are you Ruth Davidson?

Posted by: mimanifesto on: January 16, 2012

The Scottish Conservatives have a new leader. So what, most of you would say. Because to many, the Conservatives are an irrelevance here in Scotland. Dear old Annabel fussed about like a dear old auntie chiding the other party leaders with what sounded like good old homespun advice instead of the political poison darts she should have been spitting. Ruth could be a bit more savvy and on target though. After all, she’s been a journalist for many years so she should know better.

I hold no personal torch for the Conservative party in thus day and age, even the Scottish semi-skimmed brand. The Westminster mob are trying to drive through some of the most disgusting and heartless legislation I’ve ever come across with their benefit reform proposals. Making the most disadvantaged and the most sick and disabled people pay for the millionaires mistakes in mismanaging the financial and economic sectors is just obscene. Why should disability living allowance be cut to fund a (state bailed out) banker’s winter skiing trip to Verbier or St Moritz in the form of annual bonuses ? Is this the mark if a political party which cares about ordinary people? Not any more.

Because I think this was not always the case. I was a Conservative supporter in my youth. I was brought up with values like hard work, support your family, contribute to society, maintain law and order help others and remember to look after those less fortunate or disadvantaged through no fault of their own. But that’s all gone now. Our society is selfish, many choose not to work relying on the state to support their ever burgeoning families. Many refuse to contribute, the Police are shot through with corruption and perjury appears to be the norm for for a service which in many parts of the country has become a haven for trigger-happy violent politicised bullies. Instead of contributing more, our wealthiest have become addicted to excess ( bank bonuses are a damming indictment of this culture) whilst our sick and disabled are targeted for benefit cuts and labelled as malingering scroungers. And because of this I’m not the Conservative I once was, almost by nature, I think.

Ruth Davidson is, whatever many might think, a fresh face. This party has done what might have seemed unthinkable just a few years ago in an age of legislation like section 28 and elected a young, gay, woman as it’s leader. Surely to God that must be a sign of progress? So come on Ruth, get going. Fire up all your guns and blaze a bit…and follow the example of the SNP and get your social media presence going. I manage the social media presence of a small number of selected clients including a major Scottish charity, and I know just how important such a presence is if you want to connect with people and their networks in this day and age.

So come on Ruth…let’s hear what you’re all about. We’ll spread the message, good and bad, so think carefully about what you want to say. And manage your presence well (getting professional advice is essential for you) because you’ll get far more connections than a newspaper or television interview will ever get you nowadays, and you’ll be able to target your voter prospects so much more precisely through the networks of your converts than with a traditional media presence ‘scattergun’ approach.

In this era of Salmond-style quasi-presidential politics, strong opposition is needed perhaps more than ever in Scotland. We need you to play your part in this Ruth, so come on…get going girl. Start to build your tribe and who knows, we may just follow you…

Thanks to Amnesty International Scotland for the creative commons photo- at least we know one thing Ruth stands for now !

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Independence… Good sense or sheer folly?

Posted by: mimanifesto on: January 15, 2012

All the bruha in the media over independence recently has been interesting to say the least. The tug of war between Alex Salmond and David Cameron over ownership of the referendum appeared to kick off a verbal turf war and the legalities of this particular process have still to be settled.

What really interests me though are the unanswered questions. Nobody on the independence side actually appears to want to address these, at least, not that I’ve read or heard. What about Scotland’s share of the national debt for example? Or Armed Forces? And what about social security and taxation? Or Border control? Scotland would not automatically be a member of the EU and would have no automatic right of entry. Indeed, specific fiscal conditions might have to be met before Scotland could join. And come to that, what about currency? Would Alex really consider joining the Euro?

These are just a few of the many things which are perplexing me at the moment. The SNP don’t appear to have stated positions on all these points. How could an independent Scotland afford to set up public services from scratch anyway. Alistair Darling highlighted some of these in a recent interview. He was fairly specific whereas Stewart Hosie from the SNP was just dismissive rather than providing a line by line critique.

I am open to persuasion on independence. Thousands if others must be too. So come on SNP – put your case by answering these questions clearly and honestly rather than just dismissing them as Unionist scare tactics…

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Jaye's del.icio.us links

 

May 2012
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 581 other followers